[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 03110) Re: kernel cannot process an IPv6 destination options header after the AH header.
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 03110) Re: kernel cannot process an IPv6 destination options header after the AH header.
- From: Ueki Kohei <ueki.kohei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:49:14 +0900
- In-reply-to: <86sm7kmjmq.wl@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
- References: <86sm7kmjmq.wl@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:58:51 +0900
- Resent-from: sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <200411100858.FMLAAB27282.usagi-users@linux-ipv6.org>
- Resent-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated)
Hello, Sekiya-san
--- Original Messages ---
snip
> > I tried the TAHI test item ipsec#20.
> > This test item uses a destination option header after AH, and the
> > test is failed.
> > This test item is passed when the undermentioned patch is applied.
>
> Could you describe detail of TAHI test ipsec#20 ?
> Sometimes the number of TAHI test item is changed, so we will
> happy to know detail of the problem.
The following is the test procedure.
Test version : ct-2.1.1 , v6eval-2.1.1
Test item : router ipsec#20.
Test item name :
"Detect modification of DstOpt header option data after AH"
Network topology:
TN--------------------TN-------------------NUT
(host) (router)
----------------- transport ------------->
Test procedure:
(1) set SAD and SPD by pfkey command
parameters :
src="x:x:x:ff05:200:ff:fe00:c1c1" ---> TN as host
dst="x:x:x:ff03:2xx:xxff:fexx:xxxx" ---> NUT
mode=transport
protocol=ah
upperspec=any
direction=in
(2) option bit 001: option data is mutable
TN(host) NUT
| |
|--echo request-->| [IPv6hdr][AH][DSTH][ICMPv6EchoReq]
| |
| | DSTH includes opt type = 0x34
| | length = 4
| | data = 0x1f1f0000
| | (data is modified)
|<-- echo reply --| *1
*1 : According to the test procedure, an echo reply should be
transmitted, but it is not actually transmitted.
But, Miyazawa-san says that an inner destination option should not
have mutable field.
Thank you.
B.R.
Ueki Kohei