[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 03148) Re: No CONFIG_IPV6_EN_DFLT option...
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 03148) Re: No CONFIG_IPV6_EN_DFLT option...
- From: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:04:59 +0900
- In-reply-to: <30686.1101199428@www66.gmx.net>
- Organization: The University of Tokyo
- References: <30686.1101199428@www66.gmx.net>
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (丸岡) FLIM/1.14.6 (丸太町) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (賢木)
At Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:43:48 +0100 (MET),
"Tobias Hof" <Tobias.Hof@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
> Do you from which kernel version on this was integrated in the mainline
> kernel?
At least, 2.6.X kernel supports the feature.
> Actually, my problem is the following:
> I want to make MobileIPv6 with a little enhanced Mobile Node, so I want to
> use the kernel patch from mobile-ipv6.org (Universsity of Helsinki) which is
> designed for the standard 2.6.8.1 kernel. I'm interested in activating the
> forwarding on the MN with two interfaces and still use the default route
> learned by RAs except for one or several hard routes on the MN.
> So my question is if it is easy to implement the EN_DFLT behaviour or if I
> could patch a 2.6.8.1 USAGI snaphot with the MIPL patch. Or do you have
> another idea?
The EN_DFLT is not a feature you want. The feature is enabling IPv6 default
route which is inserted manually or by some routing daemons, not RA
when IPv6 forwarding is enable.
-- Yuji Sekiya