[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(usagi-users 03610) Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch

To: hoerdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: (usagi-users 03610) Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:13:44 +0900 (JST)
Cc: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, olivier.matz@xxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060219134709.GC16304@clarinet.u-strasbg.fr>
Organization: USAGI/WIDE Project
References: <43F5A7B2.90803@6wind.com> <20060217.215101.09874309.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20060219134709.GC16304@clarinet.u-strasbg.fr>
Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In article <20060219134709.GC16304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:47:09 +0100), hoerdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says:

> The fix is very simple, it only grab the value of frag_size and
> use it in ip6_fragment file, could you please review the patch which
> fix that problem at :
> 
> http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/ip6_output.c.softfrag.patch

Thanks for the patch.
I think even we have np->frag_size, we should consider dst_mtu(&rt->u.dst)
as well. No?

--yoshfuji

Follow-Ups:
- (usagi-users 03611) Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch
  - From: hoerdt

References:
- (usagi-users 03605) two nf_conntrack_get_reasm() in skb_clone()
  - From: Olivier MATZ
- (usagi-users 03606) [PATCH] [NET]: NETFILTER: remove duplicated operation and fix order in skb_clone().
  - From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
- (usagi-users 03609) IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch
  - From: hoerdt

Prev by Date: (usagi-users 03609) IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch
Next by Date: (usagi-users 03611) Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch
Previous by thread: (usagi-users 03609) IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch
Next by thread: (usagi-users 03611) Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread