(usagi-users 03611) Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch

[hoerdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Yes, Hugo Santos suggested me to use the minimum of both, the new
patch is available there :

http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/ip6_output.c.softfrag.patch2

Thanks,

Hoerdt Mickaël


On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:13:44PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <20060219134709.GC16304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:47:09 +0100), hoerdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says:
> 
> > The fix is very simple, it only grab the value of frag_size and
> > use it in ip6_fragment file, could you please review the patch which
> > fix that problem at :
> > 
> > http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/ip6_output.c.softfrag.patch
> 
> Thanks for the patch.
> I think even we have np->frag_size, we should consider dst_mtu(&rt->u.dst)
> as well. No?
> 
> --yoshfuji
> 
>