[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(usagi-users 03621) bug in addrconf.c[RFC3041]?
- To: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (usagi-users 03621) bug in addrconf.c[RFC3041]?
- From: "Sabari Girish" <sabarigirishs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:52:18 +0530
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=oEBJMlXKaIqtz3Uy9zkMfVg/l9rnU9A1MiqYPclAr4oRaObu/hpdr0MDbXbhVdygECBbTIePRDvTsi0oTdTjTf9kzuIyBlLhjNoPduLDgG3h46pNJ+YumO6lQsjjVZSZ+tG/Enk1IXgiJjl+Jefdn3JDeySPt3ppdQjaLa+c0l4=
- Reply-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 04:32:22 +0900
- Resent-from: sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <200603170432.FMLAAB20293.usagi-users@linux-ipv6.org>
- Resent-to: usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated)
Hello,
I believe there is a bug in addrconf.c with the code related
to Privacy Extension of Stateless Autoconfiguration. In the function
ipv6_create_tempaddr(), the time stamp of the temporary address is made
same as that of the public address.
ift->tstamp = ifp->tstamp;
As
a result of this the regenerated temporary address will be put in
deprecated state automatically by addrconf_verify(). Instead if we
replace this statement with [ift->tstamp = jifffies], it works fine.
Could anybody comment.
Regards,
Sabari