(usagi-users 03686) Re: Bug in order of multiple IPv6 addresses per interface? Newest added one is preferred in difference to IPv4

[Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Smith schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry not to preserve the list/thread ID, I read the list via nntp/gmane, so please also CC' me directly for replies.
> 
>> # ip -6 addr show dev eth0  |grep -w inet6 |grep -w global
>     inet6 2001:db8:0:1::253/64 scope global   <- #2 !!!!
>     inet6 2001:db8:0:1::11/64 scope global    <- #1
> 
>> So the last added on is now the first in list. Also, it gets no
>> "secondary" flag and "ip" doesn't even support this flag.
> 
>> And the worse thing is that the first one in list (= last added one) is
>> now used as default for outgoing connections. Can be easily tested using
>> "ping6".
> 
> 
>> Is this a bug (I hope so) or a (undocumented?) feature?
> 
> Could it be because the new address as a newer and therefore longer
> preferred and valid lifetimes, and therefore becomes a more preferred
> IPv6 source address to use for new connections ? 

Hmm, both addresses have:
	valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

	Peter
-- 
Dr. Peter Bieringer                     http://www.bieringer.de/pb/
GPG/PGP Key 0x958F422D                       mailto:pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Deep Space 6 Co-Founder and Core Member  http://www.deepspace6.net/
OpenBC                    http://www.openbc.com/hp/Peter_Bieringer/
Personal invitation to OpenBC  http://www.openbc.com/go/invita/3889