(usagi-users 03687) Re: Bug in order of multiple IPv6 addresses per interface? Newest added one is preferred in difference to IPv4

[Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / åèèæ schrieb:
> Hello.
> 
> In article <44E94653.1040002@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:36:19 +0200), Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
> 
>> In IPv6, the behavior is completly different:
>>
>> # ip -6 addr show dev eth0  |grep -w inet6 |grep -w global
>>     inet6 2001:db8:0:1::11/64 scope global
>>
>> # ip -6 addr add 2001:db8:0:1::253/64 dev eth0
>>
>> # ip -6 addr show dev eth0  |grep -w inet6 |grep -w global
>>     inet6 2001:db8:0:1::253/64 scope global   <- #2 !!!!
>>     inet6 2001:db8:0:1::11/64 scope global    <- #1
>>
>> So the last added on is now the first in list. Also, it gets no
>> "secondary" flag and "ip" doesn't even support this flag.
> 
> IPv6 does not have secondary flag. We even reuse that for
> IPv6 temporary addresses.
> 
>> And the worse thing is that the first one in list (= last added one) is
>> now used as default for outgoing connections. Can be easily tested using
>> "ping6".
> :
>> Is this a bug (I hope so) or a (undocumented?) feature?
> 
> An implementation decision.

Thank you for this clarification.

> I do not favor changing this so far.

Hmm, would it be possible to implement a primary flag in the future?

BTW: Does anyone know about the behavior of *BSD for this issue?

	Peter
-- 
Dr. Peter Bieringer                     http://www.bieringer.de/pb/
GPG/PGP Key 0x958F422D                       mailto:pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Deep Space 6 Co-Founder and Core Member  http://www.deepspace6.net/
OpenBC                    http://www.openbc.com/hp/Peter_Bieringer/
Personal invitation to OpenBC  http://www.openbc.com/go/invita/3889